Same task
A pet that helps one goal may not be best for another. State whether you are comparing Jump progress, Wins attempts, or another visible task.
Pets are confirmed at title level. Names, stats, effects, rarity order, and acquisition details are not complete enough for honest S/A/B ranks.
Pets exist, but no complete roster, common stat set, rarity order, effect table, or acquisition record was verified. Use a visible-stat comparison checklist: same task, same displayed measure, same upgrade state, and same update. Publish exact ranks only when every current candidate and a comparable field can be checked; until then confidence is too low for S, A, or B placements.
A useful comparison needs a current roster plus at least one measure shared by every candidate. Until both exist, a confident “best pet” table would reward presentation, not reliable comparison.
A pet that helps one goal may not be best for another. State whether you are comparing Jump progress, Wins attempts, or another visible task.
Compare the same displayed effect or stat. Do not mix rarity color, level, price, and outcome into one unsupported score.
A leveled or upgraded pet cannot fairly represent the base version unless both states are labeled.
The current title includes PETS. Older video rankings may predate the version you are playing.
First, the site needs a current pet list that can be tied to this experience. Second, each pet needs a comparable field—an effect, stat, or outcome measured under the same conditions. Third, the update context must be clear. When those conditions are met, recommendations can be grouped by player job instead of forcing one universal order.
Pets are present, but a complete current roster and comparable effects or stats are not available. Letter tiers would imply evidence that is not there.
Use one visible measure at a time, keep pet level and upgrade state comparable, and note the task you care about.
After current pet names and comparable in-game effects or stats can be checked for the same game version.